Skip to main content

In Defence of Writers

When you think of a writer, do you imagine a person who is brilliant, eloquent and deeply philosophical? Someone who is charming and witty, able to hold forth on any subject and illuminate the workings of the inner and outer worlds? Or perhaps you think of a writer as a genius who worships at the altar of words, who is never seen without a book in their hand, who looks at the world and never fails to find inspiration in it. If you believe any of this, chances are you have never met a real writer.

It may be hard to identify a writer-in-embryo: children are all delightfully weird in their own way, and that little kid who can’t make friends and lives with her nose in a book may not necessarily be preparing to win the Booker Prize; she might just be intelligent and bored. Similarly, a child who is overly talkative or displays a faculty with words beyond his or her peers might actually grow up to be a smooth-talking con artist instead of a writer. Most teenagers feel, at some point in their lives, that they don’t ‘fit in’; some may start writing poetry or keeping a journal or putting out ‘thoughts’ on social media in order to express themselves. Don’t worry; your child is still normal — at least outwardly.

But then something happens inside the embryo’s mind: the bookworm realises that the books he’s reading aren’t fulfilling a deeper need inside. Writer Musharraf Ali Farooqi describes the moment he knew he was a writer when he thought, “I can think of a better story than this.” This is the point of metamorphosis for many writers: recognising the urge to create literature instead of passively consuming it. The change is irreversible; once the truth about what one aspires to do and be is glimpsed, it can’t be unseen. A writer will either spend all her life trying to write that better story or — thwarted by life’s circumstances and a lack of support and self-belief — become the most miserable person on earth. Sometimes both happen at the same time.

Not unlike Franz Kafka’s Gregor Samsa, who goes to bed a human being and wakes up a cockroach, the writer goes to bed a human being and wakes up in a state not dissimilar to that of a cockroach, scrabbling around all night trying to escape the shoes hurled at its unsightly carapace. The carapace is actually an accumulation of habits and personality traits that serve to further the process of writing, but also makes the writer look incredibly strange to other people.

For example, James Joyce wore a white coat when writing to cast light on the cardboard he wrote on — in crayon. Virginia Woolf wrote only in purple ink. John Cheever wrote only in his underwear, while Victor Hugo took off all his clothes and wrote while wrapped in a blanket. Mark Twain, George Orwell and Marcel Proust could write horizontally but not vertically, lying in bed or on a sofa. Voltaire drank 40 cups of coffee daily, but Honore de Balzac beat him by drinking 60 cups a day. Agatha Christie sat in her bathtub, eating apples, waiting for inspiration to strike.

God help anyone who has to live with a writer; it has been described, variously, as ‘difficult’, ‘unpleasant’, and ‘hell on earth’. There is a reason V.S. Naipaul, a brilliant writer, ended up having so many divorces. If you are familiar with writers such as Ernest Hemingway or Hunter S. Thompson, you’d be forgiven for thinking of all writers as irascible misanthropes who hate everyone and need to drink a bottle of whisky daily just to inoculate themselves from the mediocrity of the world. Or, as in the case of Harper Lee and J.D. Salinger, as recluses who are too sensitive to deal with their monumental success.

It’s true that writers sometimes come off as crabby, unfriendly, grouchy or utterly unsympathetic. Narcissistic is another descriptor for someone who spends a lot of time in their own head. While other people are enjoying the company of others, the writer’s mind is off working on something inexplicable.

It’s true that writers sometimes come off as crabby, unfriendly, grouchy or utterly unsympathetic. Narcissistic is another good descriptor for someone who spends a lot of time in their own head. While other people are learning social skills and enjoying themselves in the company of others, the writer’s mind is off working on something intangible and inexplicable. While you look at a beautiful evening sky and witness a magical sunset, a writer despairs over the end of time and the inability of humanity to escape its incessant pettiness. You can never quite tell whether a writer is listening to what you say or constructing a story in her head about someone who quits Earth and finds a happier life in outer space with a couple of aliens and a Mars Rover.

But it’s more than just eccentricity of behaviour that sets writers apart from the rest of the world. There’s a unique personality that develops, one that is geared towards being as protective of the writer’s inner space as possible. In this mental and emotional space, thoughts and ideas develop, and this is the writer’s most prized territory, more than any table and chair, beloved writing spot or daily habit. This inner space is cultivated by several things: silence and solitude; the absence of people who intrude on one’s concentration and focus; a discipline that gets the writer into the crucible where intellect and emotion interact; a fierce determination to guard that space because it is precious and sacred.

Writers come in many shapes and sizes, but there is one irrefutable truth about them: they are eccentric and weird, selfish and self-absorbed, somewhat cynical and always wary. But writers have made an art out of being crazy and, to paraphrase Rumi, that craziness becomes the art that they spend their lives trying to create, so that you, the reader, can enjoy. In the spirit of generosity, forgive them their foibles along the way, if you can.

______________________

© This article was originally printed in Dawn News.

Bina Shah
The author is a Pakistan writer, columnist, and blogger based in Karachi. 

Popular posts from this blog

From mosque confined Mullah to westernized Desi American: How Pakistan works today

  This article is a stub. You can help edit it .   Pakistan is labelled as the only nation founded on the basis of Islam today, a Muslim power, whose roots were strengthen during the Mughal rule in the Indian subcontinent. In fact it would be fair to say that Pakistan was the result of, so to say, Muslims' extremism against the non-Muslim's opposition. Then why, if it should be only defined by its Islamic values today, the world sees Pakistan as a threat due to the very reason that helped its creation? The answer to that lies in the two form of extremism that exist in the nation today. Whenever we skip to a news channel or read a newspaper, we cannot help but believe that religion is the main threat to our nation today. Whether we see it from the eyes of westernize Pakistani calming Islam to be backward or stand in the shoes of a mullah accusing the majority of population to be deprived of true reality. The reason is always the one that initially helped its creation: its r

Murree Never Forgot

The Holy Trinity Church, 1860  - © Murree Archive As I walked the mall road, the center of all attention today but once restricted for the locals , I was stumbled upon a strange air — a feeling mixed with the colonial nostalgia and today's hustle and bustle, that was nowhere else to be found. Murree, other than few metropolitan cities, was the only town founded during the colonial era that became part of Pakistan after the partition. Shimla, another colonial town, became part of India after a small dent by Mr. Radcliffe on the map. But politics aside, the 'colonial charm' Murree holds, as referred by the local elites here who inherited the outsider's legacy after their departure, still hides deep in the woods, invisible to most eyes. The town has gone through a tremendous change in recent years, mostly after the partition when new settlers started to arrive and turn the beautiful town into a business hub . Though difficult, it is believed the town still

Discovering Attock: The Grand Trunk Road

In Rudyard Kipling's famous novel Kim , the Grand Trunk Road is described as being “the backbone of all Hind”. The road has witnessed so much history. Along this short stretch, there is the Gandharan capital, a holy Sikh site, Moghul gardens, and the spot where Alexander crossed the Indus.  Centuries later, the hustle and bustle of now an industrial hub still echoes an untold story; we'll be witnessing a fraction of it – the Grand Turk Road to Attock.  Our journey begins with an unexpected phone call. The Government of Pakistan decided to promote the cultural side of Attock through a campaign titled, Discover Attock . All things aside, it was refreshing seeing the youth marking top seats and taking such initiatives. The answer was “ Definitely !”.  Invitees and photographers gathered at the A. D. C. Office [Asad Ullah; 2021], Hasan Abdal – a city in Attock, located 40 km northwest of the country's capital city, Islamabad. Hasan Abdal is an interesting spot with a collection

The Game of Life: Your time starts now!

“ One can never consent to creep when one feels an impulse to soar. ” Said Helen Keller, a blind who taught the world how to see. Life is, for most people, a chessboard. A board where they are free to feed their imagination and think whatever they perceive their values are. Many consider themselves a pawn, while some knight, bishop or even a queen. They create their limits and that becomes, for them, a purpose of their life. A pawn member of the society thinks he will be sacrificed, no matter what, in order for the game to proceed. A knight may survive half of the game, while the queen will consider her the right wing of the king - the, or instance, national identity everyone fights for.  But all of that is, in reality, connected with a core, without which, it is all empty. All of the pieces, or members of a society, are fighting for one thing the king merely represents: their color, an identity, or perhaps something much less tangible. The opponent, for instance,

Pakistan Army — A Colonial History

The British Empire in India, other than the local elites, relied upon a large portion of one institution more than any other: its military, or troopers who likewise ended up being the contributing factor why they later left India. During their rule in India, the British maintained a vast military to safeguard their resources, invade foreign lands and keep command over the domestic environment so as to reinforce their mandate and expand the trade for ruling elites. Hence, the military ended up as one of the most vital organs in the working of the Empire, both internally and externally. While far from any doubt majority of institutions even in British India suffered due to the absence of quality and appropriate administration, but the British Indian Army was one institution that was found in a state which would impress even the most snobbish Western observers, alongside railway system helping the Empire in trade and educational institutions which helped in creating a new class for th